HomeIn the HospitalObservation Status: Putting Patients Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Comments

Observation Status: Putting Patients Between a Rock and a Hard Place — 7 Comments

  1. This article highlights one of my greatest job dissatisfiers. The observation versus inpatient debate pits patients against physicians, as patients, wrongly feel that the doctor can change their “status” at a whim. (We cannot-the cases are all reviewed by case Managers-and if we “get it wrong” and put you as inpatient instead of obs, payment will be denied and then you are stuck with the whole bill.). I am emergency medicine and countless patients leave at great peril to themselves due to the financial implications of this rule, and it leaves them angry at the physician and the system. Some insurances have waived the 3 day stay for nursing home coverage requirements, but we have no control over this. Medications not being paid for can have huge implications for patients as many can not go without their blood pressure medication, rate control medications, or blood thinners for the duration of the observation stay., yet they add thousands of dollars to the cost of care- that the patient is responsible for.I think the most important thing for patients to know is that this system is NOT the doing of your physician. I am required to gave this conversation with each of my obs patients before they leave my department and it is often a heart wrenching one- and again status is NOT my decision, it is all decided through a complicated system of “criteria”. This system , although designed with good intentions (cost savings), has actually just further eroded the trust in physicians and the system and left vulnerable patients at risk.

    • Lane, thank you so much for this very thoughtful and accurate comment. It absolutely pits patients against physicians and is completely out of our control. I stumbled across an article that told patients “tell your doctor to change you to inpatient status” and I thought, “No, no, no. That’s not how it works!” I think I will update the article to clarify this point.

    • It’s my understanding that patients do NOT have to pay the whole bill if Medicare doesn’t pay for a patient who was classified as admitted (or inpatient) and should have been in observation care (outpatient). When that happens, the hospital doesn’t get paid but under Medicare rules, the patient cannot be charged for the full cost of the hospital visit. If I’m wrong, I’d like to know of any examples where Medicare patients received bills for the full cost after Medicare denied payment to the hospital. Thanks, Susan Jaffe, Kaiser Health News, Jaffe.KHN@gmail.com “FAQ: Hospital Observation Care” at https://khn.org/MjYzMTE

      • Susan, you are correct. If a Medicare patient is discharged and the hospital bill is denied for inappropriate admission status, the patient is not responsible for the entire hospital bill. HOWEVER, more and more hospitals receive real-time feedback from case managers and physician advisors regarding admission decisions and the lack of medical necessity. Conditiom Code 44 allows the hospital to self-deny these claims prior to the patient being discharged and convert the hospitalization to an observation (outpatient) admission. The patient must be notified, but there is no appeal process and they are then stuck with the charges I discussed in the article.

        Thanks for contributing to the discussion!

  2. Thanks so much for sharing this informative piece. This explains the exuberant bill I received following my daughter’s hospital admission for “observation” after an acute respiratory event!

  3. Very informational. Something that irks me too every day as a hospitalist, but always good to read a refresher on why and how I should consider triaging my patients between the two statuses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *